The correct qualification of act of terrorism and its distinction from diversion
( Pp. 169-170)
More about authors
Tatarov Leon Anatolyevich
kand. yurid. nauk, polkovnik policii, zamestitel nachalnika kafedry organizacii pravoohranitelnoy deyatelnosti
North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia Albert Yu. Tutukov Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor of the Department of Internal Affairs in Special Conditions; North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia; Nalchik, Russian Federation
North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia Albert Yu. Tutukov Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor of the Department of Internal Affairs in Special Conditions; North Caucasus Institute for Advanced Studies (branch) of Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia; Nalchik, Russian Federation
Abstract:
The modern criminal legislation is designed in such a way that law enforcement officials quite often have difficulties with qualification of these or those criminal actions. Also the corpus delicti provided by Art. 205 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation "Act of terrorism" isn't an exception. In practical activities quite often there are difficulties with a terrorist attack otgranicheniye from adjacent corpora delicti. In this article the author analyzes such structures as act of terrorism and diversion.
How to Cite:
Tatarov L.A., Albert Y.T., (2018), THE CORRECT QUALIFICATION OF ACT OF TERRORISM AND ITS DISTINCTION FROM DIVERSION. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 6 => 169-170.
Reference list:
Kommentariy k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii: v 2 t. (postateynyy) / pod red. A.V. Brilliantova. M., 2015. T. 2.
