SOME FEATURES OF DIFFERENTIATION OF CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY
(105-108)

More about authors
Gamidov Rinat T. Candidate of Juridical Sciences, Associate Professor Department of Criminal Law Adjieva Leyla Z. Candidate of Juridical Sciences, Associate Professor Department of Criminal Law
For read the full article, please, register or log in
Annotation:
Background. The article deals with the need to study the differentiation of criminal responsibility, which relates to the field of law-making and generally reflects the direction of the penal policy of the Russian state. This is due to its dynamism. Model. Earlier scientific studies have been subjected to comprehensive analysis and processing, as well as analyzed the criminal law itself, endures in the last few years a lot of changes. Conclusion. Effective development of measures to fight crime possible, taking into account the features of socially dangerous acts and developing approaches to classification of crimes in criminal law.
How to Cite:
Gamidov R.T., Adjieva L.Z., (2016), SOME FEATURES OF DIFFERENTIATION OF CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY. Business in Law, 5: 105-108.
Reference list:
Andreev A.V., Lobanova L.V. Ponyatie differentsiatsii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti // Vestnik VolGU. Seriya 5: YUrisprudentsiya. 2006. № 8. S. 122.
Vasilev N.V. Printsipy sovetskogo ugolovnogo prava. M., 1983. S. 42-43.
Epifanova E.V. Obshchestvennaya opasnost kak nauchnaya kategoriya, zakonodatelnaya definitsiya: istoriya i sovremennost: monografiya. M., 2012. S. 38-39.
ZHalinskiy A.E. Ugolovnoe pravo v ozhidanii peremen: teoretiko-instrumentalnyy analiz. 2014. S. 352.
Korobeev A.I. Sovetskaya ugolovno-pravovaya politika. Vladivostok, 1987. S. 165-166.
Kruglikov L.L., Vasilevskiy A.V. Differentsiatsiya otvetstvennosti v ugolovnom prave. S. 56-57; Batmanov A.A. O vidakh i sredstvakh differentsiatsii // Zakonodatelnaya tekhnika i differentsiatsiya otvetstvennosti v sovremennom ugolovnom prave i protsesse Rossii. YAroslavl, 2005. S. 90.
Kruglikov L.L. Prestuplenie kak osnovanie differentsiatsii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti // Ugolovnoe pravo: strategiya razvitiya v XXI veke: Materialy 6-y mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii 29-30 yanvarya 2009 g. M., 2009. S. 45-46.
Kurs rossiyskogo ugolovnogo prava. Obshchaya chast / Pod red. V.N. Kudryavtseva, A.V. Naumova. M., 2004. S. 146-147 (avtor glavy - V.N. Kudryavtsev).
Lagetskiy A.A. Prestuplenie i prostupok v ugolovnom prave XIX - nachala XX v.: Avtoref. dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2003. S. 19.
Lesnievski-Kostareva T.A. Differentsiatsiya ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti: Teoriya i zakonodatelnaya praktika. 2001. S. 45, 50-51.
Rogova E.V. Predposylki formirovaniya ucheniya o diffirentsiatsii ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti v teorii ugolovnogo prava na sovremennom etape // Biznes v zakone. 2012. № 3. S.105 - 108.
Martsev A.I., Mikhal O.A. Kategoriya tyazhest prestupleniya v ugolovnom prave. S. 57-58.
Melnikova YU.B. Differentsiatsiya otvetstvennosti i individualizatsiya nakazaniya. Krasnoyarsk, 1989. S. 40.
Mokoseeva M.A. Lichnost vinovnogo v prestuplenii i ee znachenie dlya ustanovleniya predelov otvetstvennosti po Ugolovnomu kodeksu RF: avtoref. dis. kand. yurid. nauk. Kazan, 2007. S. 7.
Sklyarov S.V. Vina i motivy prestupnogo povedeniya. SPb., 2004. S. 180-202.
Keywords:
criminal liability, differentiation, criminal prosecution, sanction, crime.