The question of reserves of improvement of judicial and regulatory interpretation of norms of the criminal code of Kazakhstan on the responsibility for human trafficking
( Pp. 75-80)

Task. In article through a prism of the analysis of short stories of the criminal legislation and judicial and standard interpretation possibilities of further improvement of law-enforcement practice and norms of the Criminal code of Kazakhstan about responsibility for human trafficking are investigated. Model. Methodological basis of the research conducted in addition to the formal-logical, constructive-critical was also the comparative analysis of the criminal law of Kazakhstan and Russia. In addition, the author conducted a review of the theses (23), protected in Russia and Kazakhstan over the past 10 years on the problem under study (Akimov, A., M. Buriak, Hetman I.B, Gorban E.N., Gromov S.V., Dushko D.A., Egorova L.U, Jinkin A.A. and others), 54 Bulletins of the Supreme Court on the subject of practice of application of criminal law on trafficking. In order to correlate with the General criminal policy made to the relationship with the processes of modernization of anti-crime legislation and studied publishing Kazakhstan (Akimzhanov T., Dzhansaraeva R.E., Mizanbaev AU, Moldabayev S.S. and others) and Russian scientists (Babayev M.M., Kozachenko IA, Naumov A.V., Revin VP, etc). The conclusions. In the article the author comes to the conclusion that, despite the importance of the act of judicial interpretation of the practice of application of norms of the criminal code on trafficking in persons, it has a number of gaps and shortcomings. In addition a separate legal gaps inherent in most UK RK. The main findings are the need to broaden the scope of the judicial interpretation given to the phrase "offences related to trafficking in persons, supplementing the criminal code of regulations about the use of slave labour, the act is committed by a person as part of transnational organized groups. The novelty of the theoretical and applied significance of publishing is that the author first attempted critical review of judicial and regulatory interpretation of the criminal law on the responsibility for human trafficking. In addition, the publication of the necessity to further improve the relevant rules of the criminal code, put forward a number of concrete proposals for amendments and additions

Bekmagambetov A.B., (2014), THE QUESTION OF RESERVES OF IMPROVEMENT OF JUDICIAL AND REGULATORY INTERPRETATION OF NORMS OF THE CRIMINAL CODE OF KAZAKHSTAN ON THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR HUMAN TRAFFICKING. Business in Law, 5 => 75-80.

Abdrakhmanova B.S. Rol prokuratury v koordinatsionnoy deyatel nosti po bor be s prestupnost yu v Kazakhstane // Biznes v zakone. 2013. №5
Akimzhanov T. O nekotorykh pravovykh, organizatsionnykh i sotsial nykh aspektakh protivodeystviya prestupnosti //Pravovaya reforma v Kazakhstane.-2013.-№3.
Akimzhanov T. O nekotorykh aspektakh sovremennoy kriminologicheskoy politiki v sfere preduprezhdeniya prestupnosti//Femida.-2012.-№1.
Alimkhanov T. Kogda chelovek - ob ekt torgovli lyud mi// http://pravo.zakon.kz/4644300-kogda-chelovek-obekt-torgovli-t.html/ Data obrashcheniya 22 avgusta 2014.
Analiz statisticheskikh dannykh o sostoyanii prestupnosti, svyazannoy s torgovley lyud mi za 2010-2012g.g., 11 mesyatsev 2013 goda, Astana, Komitet po pravovoy statistike i spetsial nym uchetam General noy prokuratury RK, 2013 g.
Babaev M., Pudovochkin YU. Kontseptsiya ugolovno-pravovoy politiki Rossiyskoy Federatsii//Ugolovnoe pravo.-2012.-№4.
Bekmagambetov A.B. Politika protivodeystviya torgovle lyud mi: teoreticheskie i pravovye osnovy. Monografiya Saarbryuken: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing,2012.-186 s.
Bekmagambetov A.B., Revin V.P., Rykhlov O.A. Ugolovnoe pravo Respubliki Kazakhstan. Obshchaya i osobennaya chasti: Uchebnik/Pod obshch.red. V.P.Revina. Almaty: ZHety ZHargy,2010.
Bor ba s torgovley lyud mi: Kazakhstan. Statisticheskie dannye s yanvarya 2004 - iyun 2014 goda. Astana, MOM v Kazakhstane,2014.
Bychkova S. Protivodeystvie torgovle lyud mi: sovremennoe sostoyanie i problemy//Zakon i vremya.-2012.-№5.
Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda Respubliki Kazakhstan.-2013-№1.
Dzhansaraeva R. Tendentsii ugolovnoy politiki v sovremennykh usloviyakh//Femida.-2012.-№3.
Dzhekebaev U.S. K voprosu o preemstvennosti v ugolovnom prave//Pravo i gosudarstvo.-2013.-№3.
Za poltora milliona tenge pytalis prodat novorozhdennogo malysha mat i babushka v Aktobe// http://astanatv.kz/news/show/id/25887.html Data obrashcheniya 11 sentyabrya 2014.
Kozachenko I.YA. Identifikatsiya kak paradigma ugolovnogo prava i ugolovnogo zakona// Pravotvorcheskie i pravoprimenitel nye paradigmy rekonstruktsii ugolovnogo zakonodatel stva: natsional nyy i mezhdunarodnyy opyt modelirovaniya: Kollektivnaya monografiya (na osnove materialov Mezhdunarodnogo nauchno-prakticheskogo seminara, g.Kostanay, 18 maya 2012 g.).-Kostanay,2012.
Mami K., Baishev ZH. O yuridicheskoy prirode normativnykh postanovleniy Verkhovnogo Suda Respubliki Kazakhstan//http://journal.zakon.kz/203877-o-juridicheskojj-prirode-normativnykh.html.
Mizanbaev A.E. O poiske novoy paradigmy modernizatsii mekhanizma ugolovno-pravovogo regulirovaniya //Pravotvorcheskie i pravoprimenitel nye paradigmy rekonstruktsii ugolovnogo zakonodatel stva: natsional nyy i mezhdunarodnyy opyt modelirovaniya: Kollektivnaya monografiya (na osnove materialov Mezhdunarodnogo nauchno-prakticheskogo seminara, g.Kostanay, 18 maya 2012 g.).-Kostanay,2012.
Moldabaev S. O nekotorykh problemakh edinstva sudebnoy praktiki//Zanger.-2011.-№9.
Nadirova A.K., Abel dinova T.M. K voprosu o normativnykh postanovleniyakh Verkhovnogo Suda Respubliki Kazakhstan v pravoprimenitel noy praktike//Pravovaya reforma v Kazakhstane.-2014.-№1.
Naumov A.V. Novyy kodeks ili ego novaya redaktsiya kak varianty reformirovaniya ugolovnogo zakonodatel stva (tezisy)//Pravotvorcheskie i pravoprimenitel nye paradigmy rekonstruktsii ugolovnogo zakonodatel stva: natsional nyy i mezhdunarodnyy opyt modelirovaniya: Kollektivnaya monografiya (na osnove materialov Mezhdunarodnogo nauchno-prakticheskogo seminara, g.Kostanay, 18 maya 2012 g.).-Kostanay,2012.
Nurmagambetov R.G. Obespechenie zakonnosti i pravoporyadka kak osnova konstitutsionnogo regulirovaniya obshchestvennykh otnosheniy // Nauchnye trudy RAYUN. Vyp. 11. V 2 t. T. 1. - M.: YUrist, 2011. - S. 742-744.
Obzor sudebnoy praktiki (v tom chisle praktiki naznacheniya nakazaniy) po ugolovnym delam o prestupleniyakh protiv sem i i nesovershennoletnikh//Byulleten Verkhovnogo Suda Respubliki Kazakhstan.-2013.-№12.
Surin V.V. Informatsionnaya funktsiya ugolovno-ispolnitel nogo prava // Biznes v zakone. 2014. №1.
Sydykova S. Nekotorye voprosy, svyazannye s torgovley lyud mi//Zakon i vremya.-2013.-№8.
Press-reliz o zasedanii Koordinatsionnogo soveta po voprosam vyyavleniya prestupleniy, svyazannykh s torgovley lyud mi (g.Astana, 29 aprelya 2013 g.)// http://prokuror.gov.kz/rus/novosti/press-releasy/press-reliz-o-zasedanii-koordinacionnogo-soveta-po-voprosam-vyyavleniya/ Data obrashcheniya 22 avgusta 2014 g.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan № 167-I ot 16 iyulya 1997 goda//№ http://online.zakon.kz/Document / doc id 1008032. Data obrashcheniya 10.09.2014.
Ugolovnyy kodeks Respubliki Kazakhstan №227-V ZRK ot 3 iyulya 2014 goda//Kazakhstanskaya pravda.-2014 goda.-9 iyulya.
SHakhbanova A.I. Sootnoshenie prava (optimal nogo zakona) i effektivnoy protsessual noy deyatel nosti suda // Biznes v zakone. 2013. №6.

crimes, associated with human trafficking, regulatory Statute of the Supreme court, the legal nature, Penal code, legal gap, comparative legal analysis.