THE PROBLEM OF THE DEFINITION OF THE SUPER-IMPERATIVE RULES (OVERRIDING MANDATORY PROVISIONS) OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW
( Pp. 86-91)
More about authors
Zasemkova Olesia Fedorovna
spirant. Mesto ucheby: Moskovskiy gosudarstvennyy yuridicheskiy universitet imeni O.E. Kutafina (MGYuA). Podrazdelenie: kafedra mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava. Dolzhnost: assistent. Mesto raboty: Moskovskiy gosudarstvennyy yuridicheskiy universitet imeni O.E. Kutafina (MGYuA). Podrazdelenie: Centr mezhdunarodnyh pravovyh konkursov
Moscow State Law University named after O.E.Kutafin (MSLA)
Moscow State Law University named after O.E.Kutafin (MSLA)
Abstract:
Problem: The article is devoted to the problem of indentification of the super-imperative rules of private international law. Novelty and actuality of this issue caused the preparation of this article. Upon investigating the issue the writings of the following authors have been studied: M. McParland, N. Nord, G. Ruhl, V.L. Tolstych etc. Model: The present article is dedicated to the examination of the main criteria of the super-imperative rules, which allow to make a distinction between super-imperative rules and ordinary mandatory rules. Conclusion: The author makes conclusion on the main characteristics of the super-imperative rules of Russian law, main and supplementary criterion of the super-imperative (overriding mandatory) provisions of European Union`s law, proposes the definition of super-imperative rules of Russian law.
How to Cite:
Zasemkova O.F., (2016), THE PROBLEM OF THE DEFINITION OF THE SUPER-IMPERATIVE RULES (OVERRIDING MANDATORY PROVISIONS) OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW. Business in Law, 4 => 86-91.
Reference list:
Akimova YU.M. K voprosu o sootnoshenii printsipa dispozitivnosti i svobody dogovora // Biznes v zakone. 2014. № 6.
Asoskov A.V. Kollizionnoe regulirovanie dogovorov ob osushchestvlenii korporativnykh prav (korporativnykh dogovorov) // Zakon. 2014. № 8. S. 31-42.
Zasemkova O.F. K voprosu o nekotorykh problemakh, svyazannykh s primeneniem sverkhimperativnykh norm tret ikh stran // Biznes v zakone. 2014. № 2.
Zasemkova O.F. O kvalifikatsii polozheniy, napravlennykh na zashchitu slaboy storony dogovora, v kachestve sverkhimperativnykh norm // Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo. 2015. № 4.S. 17-21.
Tolstykh V.L. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo: kollizionnoe regulirovanie. SPb.: YUrid.tsentr Press, 2004. 526 s.
Comments on the European Commission s Proposal for a Rome I: Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law. Electronic resource : http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/view content.cgi article 2612 context facul ty scholarship / (data obrashcheniya: 20.10.2014).
Ingmar GB Ltd. v. Eaton Leonard Technologies Inc. Case C-381/98. Electronic resource : http://www.eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/ uri CELEX 3A61998CJ0381 / (data obrashcheniya: 30.06.2014).
Joined Cases C-369/96 Jean Claude Arblade Fils SARL and C-376/96 Bernard Leloup, Sofrage SARL // European Court Reports. 1999. I-8453.
Kunda I. Defining Internationally Mandatory Rules in European Private Law of Contracts. Electronic resource : http://www.academia.edu/816 471/Defining Inter nationally Mandatory Rules in Europe an Private International Law of Contracts /
McParland M. The Rome I Regulation on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations. Oxford, 2015. 833 p.
Nord N. Ordre Public et Lois de Police. These pour le Doctorat en Droit. Strasbourg, 2003.527 p.
Plender R., Wilderspin M. The European Contracts Convention: The Rome Convention on the Choice of Law for contracts. 2nd ed. London, 2001.
Proposal of the European Parliament and the Council on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations (Rome I). COM (2005) 650 final. 2005/0261 (COD). Electronic resource : http://www.euromonitor.eu/9353000/1/ j9vvik7m1c3gyxp/vi8rm2zvwizd / (data obrashcheniya: 01.01.2016).
Proposal for a Rome I: from German delegation to Committee on Civil Matters (Rome I). 13036/06. ADD 12. 27.09.2006. Electronic resource : http://www.euromonitor.nl/9353000/j9vvik7m1 c3gyxp/vi7jgt41z4z5 / (data obrashcheniya: 30.11.2015).
Proposal for a Rome I: from French delegation to Committee on Civil Matters (Rome I). 7953/07. 27.03.2007. Electronic resource : http://www.euromonitor.nl/9353000/1/ j9vvik7m1c3gyxp/vi7jgt5 k7fwk / (data obrasheniya: 30.11.2015).
S hk alojen ammattiliitto ry Elektrobudowa Sp lka Akcyjna. Case C-396/13. Opinion of Advocate General Wahl. 18.09.2014. Electronic resource : http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi doc /eu/cases/EUECJ/2014/C 39613O. html query overriding mandatory provisions Rome i Reg ulation method all / (data obrashcheniya: 01.01.2016).
United Antwerp Maritime Agencies (Unamar) NV v. Nabigation Maritime Bulgare. Case 184/12. Electronic resource : http://curia.europa.eu/juris/ liste.jsf num C-184/12 / (data obrashcheniya: 30.06.2015).
Verschraegen B. Complexity of Transnational Sources Austria // Ferreri S. Complexity of Transnational Sources. Reports to the XVIIIth International Congress of Comparative Law. Washington, D.C. 2010.
Asoskov A.V. Kollizionnoe regulirovanie dogovorov ob osushchestvlenii korporativnykh prav (korporativnykh dogovorov) // Zakon. 2014. № 8. S. 31-42.
Zasemkova O.F. K voprosu o nekotorykh problemakh, svyazannykh s primeneniem sverkhimperativnykh norm tret ikh stran // Biznes v zakone. 2014. № 2.
Zasemkova O.F. O kvalifikatsii polozheniy, napravlennykh na zashchitu slaboy storony dogovora, v kachestve sverkhimperativnykh norm // Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo. 2015. № 4.S. 17-21.
Tolstykh V.L. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo: kollizionnoe regulirovanie. SPb.: YUrid.tsentr Press, 2004. 526 s.
Comments on the European Commission s Proposal for a Rome I: Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law. Electronic resource : http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/view content.cgi article 2612 context facul ty scholarship / (data obrashcheniya: 20.10.2014).
Ingmar GB Ltd. v. Eaton Leonard Technologies Inc. Case C-381/98. Electronic resource : http://www.eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/ uri CELEX 3A61998CJ0381 / (data obrashcheniya: 30.06.2014).
Joined Cases C-369/96 Jean Claude Arblade Fils SARL and C-376/96 Bernard Leloup, Sofrage SARL // European Court Reports. 1999. I-8453.
Kunda I. Defining Internationally Mandatory Rules in European Private Law of Contracts. Electronic resource : http://www.academia.edu/816 471/Defining Inter nationally Mandatory Rules in Europe an Private International Law of Contracts /
McParland M. The Rome I Regulation on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations. Oxford, 2015. 833 p.
Nord N. Ordre Public et Lois de Police. These pour le Doctorat en Droit. Strasbourg, 2003.527 p.
Plender R., Wilderspin M. The European Contracts Convention: The Rome Convention on the Choice of Law for contracts. 2nd ed. London, 2001.
Proposal of the European Parliament and the Council on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations (Rome I). COM (2005) 650 final. 2005/0261 (COD). Electronic resource : http://www.euromonitor.eu/9353000/1/ j9vvik7m1c3gyxp/vi8rm2zvwizd / (data obrashcheniya: 01.01.2016).
Proposal for a Rome I: from German delegation to Committee on Civil Matters (Rome I). 13036/06. ADD 12. 27.09.2006. Electronic resource : http://www.euromonitor.nl/9353000/j9vvik7m1 c3gyxp/vi7jgt41z4z5 / (data obrashcheniya: 30.11.2015).
Proposal for a Rome I: from French delegation to Committee on Civil Matters (Rome I). 7953/07. 27.03.2007. Electronic resource : http://www.euromonitor.nl/9353000/1/ j9vvik7m1c3gyxp/vi7jgt5 k7fwk / (data obrasheniya: 30.11.2015).
S hk alojen ammattiliitto ry Elektrobudowa Sp lka Akcyjna. Case C-396/13. Opinion of Advocate General Wahl. 18.09.2014. Electronic resource : http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi doc /eu/cases/EUECJ/2014/C 39613O. html query overriding mandatory provisions Rome i Reg ulation method all / (data obrashcheniya: 01.01.2016).
United Antwerp Maritime Agencies (Unamar) NV v. Nabigation Maritime Bulgare. Case 184/12. Electronic resource : http://curia.europa.eu/juris/ liste.jsf num C-184/12 / (data obrashcheniya: 30.06.2015).
Verschraegen B. Complexity of Transnational Sources Austria // Ferreri S. Complexity of Transnational Sources. Reports to the XVIIIth International Congress of Comparative Law. Washington, D.C. 2010.
Keywords:
the mandatory rules, rules of direct application, the public interest, the "weak" side of the contract.
Related Articles
5. CIVIL LAW; ENTREPRENEURIAL LAW; FAMILY LAW; INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LAW; Civil procedure arbitration procedure Pages: 103-106 Issue №8046
THE IMPACT OF INTERNATIONALLY MANDATORY RULES ON THE ENFORCEABILITY OF ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS AND CHOICE-OF-COURT AGREEMENTS
the mandatory rules
the arbitration agreement
prorogation agreement
Show more
10. CIVIL LAW, HOUSING LAW, FAMILY LAW, INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LAW Pages: 156-159 Issue №3758
The problems of the application of the super-imperative rules of the third countries
the mandatory rules
the mandatory rules of third countries
the principle of closest connection (close connection)
the place of performance of obligations (lex loci solutionis)
Show more
