PROBLEMATIC ASPECTS OF BRINGING TO CIVIL LIABILITY OF EXECUTIVE BODIES OF COMPANIES
( Pp. 132-139)

Aim: corporate law has been seriously reformed for the last few years. New norms influence law practices. The economical crises led to the growth in number of corporate lawsuits. Participants and shareholders of commercial companies started more actively bringing to justice the executive bodies of commercial companies. The problems of corporative legal relationships have been deeply studied by modern Russian civlists such as E.A. Sukhanov, I.S. Shitkina as well as foreign authors. In 2013 Gerner-Beuerle C., Paech Ph., Schuster Ed. Ph from the London Schools of Economics carried out a wide-scale research on the responsibility of company heads in the EU countries. The aim of this work is to research the applied aspects of brining company CEOs to justice via loss claims. Methodology: methodological ground of research includes a number of methods of scientific cognition. Both general scientific research methods (dialectics, analysis and synthesis) and particular scientific research methods (technical, law comparative) are used. Conclusions: inthe article law enforcement practices such as positions of supreme juridical authorities are generalized. Some specific features of different corporate lawsuits including bringing the executive bodies of company to civil responsibility are found out. Specific features of legal regulations of a company individual executive body in civil and labor law are found out. We underlined that loss claims lawsuits in case of bankruptcy could be considered by arbitration court according to the rules on corporative lawsuits and sometimes by general jurisdiction courts. Despite the similarity of situations, the outcome of lawsuits are dramatically different. It is connected with differences in applied norms, circumstances which are to be proved, and original situation of affected legal body. Possible further use of results of our scientific work: loss claim lawsuits are an important and rather effective way to protect the rights commercial company and its participants (shareholders). One of the numerous reasons for filing a claim of this category is studied in this work. The logical continuation is a research of other reasons for loss claims and correspondent law enforcement practices. Practical value: this article is useful for practicing lawyers of commercial companies because it presents the main problems which they should pay attention to while filing a loss claim or providing legality of acts of individual executive body of a commercial company. Social consequences: responsibility of company CEOs has a special social and ethical value. Study of authority limits of company CEOs and research of effective mechanisms of brining them to justice allow us to provide a real control of business owners (participants, shareholders) over the activity of hired CEOs. Value: this work aims at students, Master's program students and other people studying corporative law and arbitration process, as well as practicing lawyers who have to dal with law regulations of activity of commercial company executive bodies and bringing them to justice.

Zagoruiko I.U., Kolesen E.V., (2016), PROBLEMATIC ASPECTS OF BRINGING TO CIVIL LIABILITY OF EXECUTIVE BODIES OF COMPANIES. Business in Law, 2 => 132-139.

Apellyatsionnoe opredelenie Verkhovnogo suda respubliki Mariy El ot 28 oktyabrya 2014 g. po delu № 33-1846/2014
Arbitrazhnyy protsessual nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Feder. zakon Ros. Federatsii ot 24 iyulya 2002 № 95-FZ // Parlamentskaya gazeta. 2002. 27 iyulya.
Boyko T.S. Otvetstvennost chlenov organov upravleniya yuridicheskikh lits. Kommentariy k otdel nym polozheniyam proekta Postanovleniya Plenuma VAS RF O nekotorykh voprosakh vozmeshcheniya ubytkov litsami, vkhodyashchimi v sostav organov yuridicheskogo litsa // Zakon. 2013. № 6. S. 83-92.
Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii (chast pervaya): Feder. zakon Ros. Federatsii ot 30 noyabrya 1994 № 51-FZ // Sobr. zakonodatel stva Ros. Federatsii. 1994. 05 dekabrya. № 32.
Korporativnoe pravo: uchebnik / E.G. Afanas eva, V.YU. Bakshinskas, E.P. Gubin i dr.; otv. red. I.S. SHitkina. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M: KNORUS, 2015. 1080 s.
Kuznetsov A.A. Kommentariy k Postanovleniyu Plenuma VAS RF ot 30.07.2013 № 62 O nekotorykh voprosakh vozmeshcheniya ubytkov litsami, vkhodyashchimi v sostav organov yuridicheskogo litsa // Vestnik VAS RF. 2013. № 10. S. 42-64.
O nesostoyatel nosti (bankrotstve): Feder. zakon Ros. Federatsii ot 26 oktyabrya 2002 g. №127-FZ // Ros.gaz. 2002. 02 noyabrya.
Ob aktsionernykh obshchestvakh: Feder. zakon Ros. Federatsii ot 26 dekabrya 1995 g. №208-FZ // Ros.gaz. 1995. 29 dekabrya.
Ob obshchestvakh s ogranichennoy otvetstvennost yu: Feder. zakon Ros. Federatsii ot 08 fevralya 1998 g. №14-FZ // Ros.gaz. 1998. 17 fevralya.
O nekotorykh voprosakh vozmeshcheniya ubytkov litsami, vkhodyashchimi v sostav organov yuridicheskogo litsa: Postanovlenie Plenuma VAS RF ot 30 iyulya 2013 № 62 // Ekonomika i zhizn (Bukhgalterskoe prilozhenie). 2013. 30 avgusta. № 34.
O nekotorykh voprosakh, svyazannykh s primeneniem glavy III.1 Federal nogo zakona O nesostoyatel nosti (bankrotstve): Postanovlenie Plenuma VAS RF ot 23dekabrya 2010 №63 // Vestnik VAS RF. 2011. mart. № 3.
O primenenii sudami nekotorykh polozheniy razdela I chasti pervoy Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF ot 23 iyunya 2015 № 25 // Ros.gaz. 2015. 30 iyunya.
Postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Severo-Zapadnogo okruga ot 07.04.2015 № F07-931/2015 po delu № A56-16114/2014
Postanovlenie Arbitrazhnogo suda Ural skogo okruga ot 08.08.2014 N F09-3614/14 po delu № A76-22111/2012
Postanovlenie Pyatogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 11.02.2015 № 05AP-15632/2014 po delu № A51-30463/2013
Postanovlenie SHestogo arbitrazhnogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 10.10.2012 № 06AP-4342/2012 po delu № A16-1341/2010
Sukhanov E.A. Sravnitel noe korporativnoe pravo. M.: Statut, 2014. 456 s.
Trudovoy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Feder. zakon Ros. Federatsii ot 30 dekabrya 2001 g. №197-FZ // Ros.gaz. 2001. 31 dekabrya.
Gerner-Beuerle C., Paech Ph., Schuster Ed. Ph. Annex to Study on Directors Duties and Liability. Department of Law, The London School of Economics and Political Science. 2013. 892 p.

corporate dispute, liability of the management bodies, corporate law, employment law.