Problems of the Lease for Construction Purposes in the Russian Supreme Court Case Law: is the Building Right the Better Option
( Pp. 213-224)

More about authors
Ivanova Ekaterina Yurievna aspirantka kafedry grazhdanskogo prava yuridicheskogo fakulteta; magistr yurisprudencii (RShChP), starshiy yurist
Lomonosov Moscow State University; Sirota & Partners Law Firm
Moscow, Russia
Abstract:
The purpose of the research. The article discusses the reasonableness of introducing into Russian law a new limited real property right to the land plot - the building right, proposed for adoption in the bill on the property law reform. Based on the analysis of the recent case law related to the lease for construction purposes, the author compares this institution with the new building right, examines the shortcomings of the lease and assesses how the building right, as it is drafted in the bill, may contribute to their elimination. The author also assesses the prospects for the property law reform and provides suggestions for possible revision of the regulation of the building right provided for in the bill. Results. Based on the results of the research, the author concludes that both the lease for construction purposes and the building right have certain drawbacks and need to be reformed. In this regard, at the moment the choice of the path of further development is in the legislator’s hands. When adopting a bill on the property law reform, the legislator is entitled to provide for an imperative transition from the currently used lease for construction purposes to the building right. At the same time, considering the opinion of practicing lawyers and representatives of the legal doctrine, it seems a more reasonable and balanced decision to leave the choice of the most optimal model for establishing rights to the land plot for construction purposes for the interested parties and provide for a transitional period to ensure smooth adaptation to new regulation.
How to Cite:
Ivanova E.Y., (2021), PROBLEMS OF THE LEASE FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES IN THE RUSSIAN SUPREME COURT CASE LAW: IS THE BUILDING RIGHT THE BETTER OPTION. Gaps in Russian Legislation, 3 => 213-224.
Reference list:
Hattenhauer H. Verdinglichung der Miete: Bricht Miete Kauf // Neue Zeitschrift f r Miet- und Wohnungsrecht, 2003.
Heinemann, M nchener Kommentar zum BGB // 8. Auflage 2020.
H bner R. Grundz ge des deutschen Privatrechts // 5. Auflage, Leipzig, 1930.
Jusztinger J. Economic Significance of the Ancient Roman Superficies. // Journal on European History of Law, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2017.
Nussbaum A. Das neue deutsche Wirtschaftsrecht: eine systematische bersicht ber die Entwicklung des Privatrechts und der benachbarten Rechtsgebiete seit Ausbruch des Weltkrieges / Verlag von Julius Springer, Berlin, 1922.
Pikalo A. Besonderheiten des Erbbaurechts // Recht der Landwirtschaft, 1970.
Schupp R. Ein Vorschlag: Dienstbarmachung der Rechtsinstitution des Erbbaurechts zur Preisauflockerung auf dem Baubodenmarkt // Juristische Rundschau (JR), Isue 12, Volume 1967.
Silagi M., Faulkner S.N. Henry George and Europe: In Germany, George s Followers, Headed by Adolf Damaschke, Won Several Statutes and a Constitutional Revision // The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Vol. 52, No. 3, July, 1993.
Thiel F. Strategisches Fla chenmanagement und Eigentumspolitik: Bodenrechtliche Hemmnisse und Herausforderungen fu r die Etablierung einer lokalen Fla chenkreislaufwirtschaft // UFZ-Umweltforschungszentrum Leipzig-Halle GmbH Department Umwelt- und Planungsrecht Permoserstr. 15, Leipzig, 2004.
Time Limited Interests in Land // Edited by Der Merwe, Cornelius Van, and Alain-Laurent Verbeke, Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Winkler K., Schl gel J., von Oefele H., Handbuch Erbbaurecht // Verlag C.H. Beck Munchen, 6., berarbeitete Auflage, 2016.
Aleksandrova M.A., Gromov S.A., Krasnova T.S., Rasskazova N.YU., Rudokvas A.D., Rybalov A.O., Tolstoy YU.K. Zaklyuchenie kafedry grazhdanskogo prava SPbGU na proekt izmeneniy razdela o veshchnykh pravakh GK RF // Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii. 2020. № 7. S. 62 - 111.
Bevzenko R.S. O tselesoobraznosti i zhelatel nosti vvedeniya prava zastroyki v rossiyskoe pravo // Zakon. 2016. № 6. S. 53 - 57.
Bevzenko R.S. Printsip edinstva sud by prav na zemel nyy uchastok i na stroeniya na nem // Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava. 2020. № 2. S. 60-123.
Bibikov A.I. Rimskaya pravovaya model prava zastroyki i ee vospriyatie v otechestvennoy doktrine i zakonodatel stve // Lex russica. 2015. № 1. S. 41 - 50.
Braude I.L., Neobkhodim li institut prava zastroyki v Grazhdanskom kodekse SSSR / Sotsialisticheskaya zakonnost . M., 1947. № 6 (iyun ). S. 10-12.
Vil nyanskiy S.I. Pravo zastroyki v SSSR / Uchenye zapiski, KHar kovskiy yuridicheskiy institut. KHar kov: Izdanie KHar kovskogo yuridicheskogo instituta, 1940. Vypusk 2. S. 3-18.
Vitryanskiy V.V. Novoe (proektiruemoe) veshchnoe pravo // KHozyaystvo i pravo. 2016. № 4 (Prilozhenie). S. 3-48.
Vydrin A.S., Vilenkin M.V. Zakon o prave zastroyki so vstupitel noy stat ey i podrobnymi postateynymi raz yasneniyami, sostavlennymi po zakonodatel nym motivam. // M.: Knigoizdatel stvo SHkola , 1913.
Goykhbarg A.G. Zakon o prave zastroyki: Prakticheskiy kommentariy // S.-Peterburg. Izdanie YUridicheskogo knizhnogo sklada Pravo , 1913.
Emel kina I.A. Veshchnoe pravo zastroyki chuzhogo zemel nogo uchastka // Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya RF. 2010. № 11.
Emel kina I.A. Nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy k gl. 20.1 Pravo zastroyki proekta federal nogo zakona O vnesenii izmeneniy v chasti pervuyu, vtoruyu, tret yu i chetvertuyu Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii, a takzhe v otdel nye zakonodatel nye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava № 1, 2015. T. 15. S. 101-139.
Izmeneniya v sfere veshchnogo prava dolzhny stroit sya po meditsinskomu printsipu ne navredi i po russkoy pogovorke Sem raz otmer , odin raz otrezh Interv yu s O.V. Kiselevoy // Vestnik Arbitrazhnogo suda Moskovskogo okruga. 2020. № 2. S. 10 - 20.
Kantorovich YA.A. Pravo zastroyki (tekst i kommentariy k st. st. 71 - 84 Grazhdanskogo kodeksa) // Grazhdanskiy kodeks: Prakticheskiy kommentariy, pod red. A.M. Vinavera i I.B. Novitskogo. M., 1924.
Kasso L. A. Zdaniya na chuzhoy zemle // Izdanie knizhnogo magazina I.K. Golubeva pod firmoyu Pravovedenie , M.: 1905.
Kasso L.A. Russkoe pozemel noe pravo // Izdanie knizhnogo magazina I.K. Golubeva pod firmoyu Pravovedenie , M.: 1906.
Kopylov A.V. Veshchnye prava na zemlyu v rimskom, russkom dorevolyutsionnom i sovremennom rossiyskom grazhdanskom prave. M.: Statut , 2000.
Korostin S.A. Istoricheskiy opyt resheniya problemy povysheniya kachestva zhil ya v sotsial no-ekonomicheskoy politike Rossii // Problemy sovremennoy ekonomiki, № 4 (52), 2014.
Kruzinski-Singer E. Pravu zastroyki v Germanii skoro budet 100 let / Arbitrazhnaya praktika, № 6, iyun 2015. S. 14-21.
Leont eva E.A., Em M. Nasledstvennoe pravo zastroyki: opyt Germanii // Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava. 2011. № 6. S. 30-61.
Meyer D.I. Russkoe grazhdanskoe pravo. / Petrograd, tipografiya Dvigatel , 1914.
Mitilino M.I. Pravo zastroyki. Opyt tsivilisticheskogo issledovaniya instituta /Kiev: Tipografiya nasl. T.G. Meynandera. 1914.
Pokrovskiy I. A. Istoriya rimskogo prava / Izd. 3-e, ispravlennoe i dopolnennoe, Petrograd, izdanie yuridicheskogo knizhnogo sklada Pravo , 1917.
Rimskoe chastnoe pravo / Pod red. I.B. Novitskogo i I.S. Pereterskogo, M.: Zertsalo-M, 2008.
Rybalov A.O. Kratkiy obzor polozheniy o prave zastroyki // Vestnik VAS RF. 2012. № 10. S. 6-21.
Rybalov A.O. Pochemu ya protiv reformy veshchnogo prava // Zakon. 2020. № 3. S. 126-131.
Simolin A.A. Zakon o prave zastroyki / Vestnik Grazhdanskogo prava. SPb., 1913. № 7 (Noyabr ). S. 21-46.
Sinayskiy V. I. Russkoe grazhdanskoe pravo. Vypusk I. Obshchaya chast . Veshchnoe pravo. Avtorskoe pravo (izdanie 2-e, ispravlennoe i dopolnennoe). // Kiev, tipo-litografiya Progress , 1917.
Keywords:
building right, superficies, lease for construction purposes, property law reform.


Related Articles

4. Theory and history of law and state; History of law and State teachings Pages: 88-91 Issue №9149
TO QUESTION ABOUT BRIEF CONTENT OF «JUS IN RE ALIENA» IN ROMAN PRIVATE LAW
the right to other people's things the right of ownership Roman private law easement superficies
Show more
8. CIVIL LAW; ENTREPRENEURIAL LAW; FAMILY LAW; INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LAW Pages: 167-170 Issue №14823
REAL RIGHT OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN OUTSIDE LAND PATCH IN MODERN EUROPEAN LAW
property law building right land patch housing crisis owner
Show more